Wednesday, January 9, 2013

21st Century Male Civil Rights

You might be a bit dumbfounded by the title of this blog and its relevance to what we have learned, read, and discussed so far.  I realize I will probably be ridiculed for this blog post and have stereotypical comments thrown my way, but I feel this needs to be addressed immediately in our society.  I feel, throughout this year, I have become a man against the mainstream.  What I mean about this is that I have a tendency to refute a lot of the common popular belief among those in our society.  One of those I have found in the United States is the misconception of gender equality in the twenty-first century.  Historically, the female gender has been the gender that has been oppressed, look down upon, and considered to be worthless in terms of traditional societal progress outside of the home.  But, I feel that in our modern day United States society there has been a subliminal reversal of roles.  Much of the reading we have done in this class and much of our discussion has been within the context of men being "evil" or "bad".  Basically, going back to pre-21st century gender role concepts.  Though I feel now that it is now the male gender that is under oppression by popular belief.  Every time I read an article regarding anything to do with gender roles seems to have a negative connotation to the male race.  I see this in education, media, and many other influential categories.

In education, specifically, in post-secondary education.  I have just finished going through the college application process and have learned so much about the distribution of gender that consists in the higher-education schools.  The gender distribution for students in college is now fifty-seven percent women.  It seems now women are either receiving an ample amount more consideration for post-secondary education than males, or males are just becoming dumber at an exponential rate.  Though, it is possible that the males may becoming more idiotic at this crazy of a rate just like how the Liberty Mutual commercials depict almost only males as the humans who make mistakes.  Yet I find it very difficult to believe that as a truth, there has been no scientific discovery suggesting that females are genetically more inclined to want to expand their knowledge or intelligence levels.  I believe that the result of the gender distribution is faulted to the colleges and universities that select students.  For some reason, it has been shown that being female leaves you with a higher chance of acceptance over being male.  The example of a male, who has a grade-point average of 4.2 on a 5 scale and an ACT score of 30, applies to a state university is one of two candidates who will get in.  His competitor a female with the same academic and personal credentials.  In summation, they were practically identical, except for their gender.  As you can see from the gender spread, the chances a female is selected is a much higher probability than males.  This does not suggest an equal opportunity for males.  Though this gender role flip does not only apply to academics it applies socially, also.

We now see in society that there are more and more stay-at-home fathers.  I am not saying this is bad, but I am displaying how the gender roles have switched.  One can observe this being depicted in our media today.  The hit show on NBC, Parenthood, follows a fictional family that is depicted as realistic as possible, with experiences that many families also face.  Though with one of the sisters, who is a lawyer and whose husband is a contractor.  Though when they get married and have a child he becomes the stay at home father.  This situation happens again later in the show where two of the brothers get laid off and are searching for jobs, but their wives start working.  Then the two brothers also become stay-at-home dads, while the women work.  Just some other quick background, the writer and producer of the show are both men so it is not the bias of a woman writing the show.

With this shift in our society, men should now proceed to act back.  We, men, need to now develop what women have used to propel themselves into their roles and equality.  We need to start promoting and believing in masculinism.  If women have feminism, why can a form of masculinism be socially absent?  Even as I proof read this post, I notice how there is no word for masculinism.  Thus, why can it be that women can have a system of ideals for pride and progress of their gender, but not men?


http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/education/2005-10-19-male-college-cover_x.htm

6 comments:

  1. Because men's role in this artificial social construct is to be those that dont need more rights, but have them already. Why not take the position that neither should advocate for their own rights and admit to the unfixable faults of reality.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I feel like today, society wants to make up for its wrongs against females in the past, so maybe we are treated differently in some respects. But I think women still have to face more obstacles and discrimination than men, what with the objectification of women in media and prevailing opinions that we are lesser human beings, especially in Middle Eastern countries. So I respect your opinion, but I must disagree a bit.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You are right in that degree, in that men also face oppression but in a different sense than women do. Women sometimes do take advantage of this which does not help.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree with what you're saying, and Jonny do you think that society will be able to move forward if people only acknowledge the wrong doings, but not do anything about it?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Okay, valid point, but how about nobody gets rights. How do you think people would act then?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I found your argument interesting. I don't agree with most of your viewpoint, but I appreciate your use of ethos and logos to construct your argument.

    I do agree that the media has developed the "dumb dude" role and played it up big time. But, those lazy dumb, chubby dudes always have "hot" wives (who are always kinda "witchy"). Take Joel on Parenthood -- he's portrayed as the hero, while Julia is seen as a B. So maybe everyone is moving backward?

    ReplyDelete